Unveiling the Deception
Rancourt’s testimony begins by dismantling the assumption that government interventions were necessary to combat the pandemic. Drawing upon extensive research and mortality data, he unequivocally states that the outcome would have been far better if governments had refrained from implementing mandates and restrictions. Contrary to popular belief, Rancourt reveals that the mortality signals did not align with the patterns expected of a viral respiratory disease pandemic. Exposing the contradictions, he highlights the absence of synchronized mortality peaks worldwide and demonstrates that the supposed pathogen was not exceptionally virulent. Rancourt’s meticulous analysis reveals the fallacy of the prevailing and official narrative of Covid19.
Assault on the People
Rancourt goes on to assert that the government’s measures were an assault on the people, leading to excess mortality. He points out that the peak of mortality immediately following the pandemic announcement was localized in specific hotspots where aggressive treatment protocols, rather than the disease itself, caused the tragic loss of life. Rancourt highlights the correlation between these hotspots and the imposition of aggressive measures, such as isolating vulnerable populations and disrupting social contracts. He emphasizes that these measures disproportionately affected marginalized communities, exacerbating poverty and leading to further loss of life. Rancourt’s testimony forces us to confront the devastating consequences of governmental actions.
Injections as Weapons
Perhaps one of the most shocking revelations in Rancourt’s testimony is his assertion that the injections themselves, that were forced on public as a solution, are being used as weapons. Drawing upon geopolitical analysis, Rancourt connects the dots between global power dynamics and the push for widespread vaccination. He explains that the military’s involvement in the organization and execution of the vaccination campaign enables them to quickly control and manipulate populations. Rancourt argues that these injections can be weaponized to subdue resistance or act as an antidote in the face of potential attacks. His bold claim challenges our perception of vaccinations as solely a public health measure, pushing us to examine the larger geopolitical context.
Understanding the Why
Rancourt’s testimony takes us beyond the immediate impacts of the pandemic, encouraging us to explore the underlying motivations and geopolitical realities. He argues that the current geopolitical landscape, characterized by the preparation for future wars, shapes the trajectory of global events. Rancourt highlights the significance of geopolitics in driving societal structures and the potential role of the pandemic as a tool within this framework. By shedding light on the geopolitical interests involved, Rancourt asks people to critically analyze our global context and question Canada’s support for military counter-measures such as mRNA platforms.
Denis Rancourt’s testimony at the National Citizens Inquiry unveils a truth that challenges prevailing narratives and demands our attention. It reveals the catastrophic impacts of government measures and exposes the geopolitical forces influencing our world and how they relate to one another. Rancourt’s courage in sharing his expertise forces us to reevaluate the conventional wisdom surrounding the pandemic.
Please watch the video below for the entire testimony.
Please refer to the earlier videos showcasing Dr. Rancourt’s groundbreaking revelations dating back to March 2021: