That’s right, the ‘principles’ in the company overseeing the election are among those accused of taking bribes in this testimony, and what was that about the judges …?
Some of the very cases that ruled against Kari Lake’s claims that irregularities in the process caused many voters on election day to be disenfranchised, were potentially decided by judges who are themselves alleged to be on the take, paid by people who are attempting to influence election outcomes.
That seems pretty newsworthy. If nothing else, our vaunted ‘Defenders of Democracy’ should be all over this. As they would be if only this story could be weaponized against a Republican.
The fact that this ISN’T top-of-fold headline news tells you everything you need to know about who’s implicated in these allegations… which Breger is happy to back up with evidence — her document itself runs about 300 pages with approximately 3000 attachments, including source documents, title deeds, handwriting samples and all the other interesting things you might expect a financial fraud expert to be looking into.